Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 23:50

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
I tried the 6-6-6 walking challenge for a week and my step count skyrocketed - Fit&Well
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
What do you do when you are struggling to fall asleep?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What does the Turkish word çıplak mean?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
McDonald's shares slip after downgrade spurred by weight-loss drug popularity - CBS News
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
How do I promote my book to get it reviewed and grow an audience if I already published it?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
FIFA Club World Cup predictions: Who are tournament favorites? - MLSsoccer.com